Keywords: 2010, David Lee, Donnie Walsh, Lebron, Mike D'Antoni, Nate Robinson, New York Knicks., Ramon Sessions
I mean, really Knicks??
August 14, 2009
Ondre Baronette
I mean, really Knicks??
I hope that Mr. Donnie Walsh goes out there and gets Ramon Sessions. This young baller out of Nevada can be Raja Bell like for Mike D'Antoni's Knicks. No, he won't guard the two, but he can be a good player against the point. Raja Bell might have been a bit of an overstatement, but I really think they need depth at the point. Duhon and Douglass cannot be the full plan. I could see Monta Ellis finding his way with the team. Golden State has depth at his position, and although they are committed to him, I could see them working something out. I just believe that with the team staying the way it is, the season will be just like last year, even with the addition of Hill and Douglass. Nate and David are still unresolved, and training camp is 10 weeks away or there about. I think it's about time we see what we have. The ambiguity with which Mr. Walsh has the Knicks operating on is different, and the organization needed different, but come on. This is New York, and I know we are waiting for 2010, where the marquee players will be available, but this is just not what the fans are looking for. Draft picks aren't good enough to rally the base, and only Rubio, Curry, or Evans, would have excited the city. Hill and Douglas-especially Douglas- will prove to be well researched players. They might turn out spectacular plays, but don't have the rubber stamp, of cant miss player tag. I just want to see the organization take steps towards greatness, and it's not likely going to come from buying a team, although the Yankees may have done it this off-season. But, there were players on the Yankees roster prior to off season acquisitions. They are still showing signs of mediocrity and the fans have nothing to be excited for, besides their young players. Chandler, Gallo, Hill and Douglass. Add Hughes to that lineup and what do u have? Or, Duhon, Hughes, Chandler, Gallo, Hill? Hughes, Chandler, Gallo, Jefferies, Harrington? Douglas, Chandler, Gallo, Harrington, Hill? All of these possibilities have no real defensive scheme. Douglass will be an annoying defender, and point guards will be on notice. I'd like to see him and Nate in the back-court, with Chandler, Harrington and Hill. Hughes and Jefferies are expendable, and hopefully play well to get offers for a 2010 draft pick. Cheap young talent in Gallo, Chandler, Hill and Douglas, around dominant players. Lets get it done..
You must be logged in to post a comment.


